Historically, there were some problems; one being the circular reasoning in the definitions of gathering versus transmission for onshore gas pipelines; and another was the use of city limits or municipal boundaries to define which gathering lines were subject to regulation.
With the adoption by reference of the consensus standard published in April 2000 as American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice 80 (API RP-80) – “Guidelines for the Definition of Onshore Gas Gathering Lines,” the new regulation uses the definitions in API RP 80 to define the points where gas gathering begins and where gas gathering ends, with five limitations imposed by PHMSA. Further, the use of class location and a tier-based risk was used to determine the level of regulation, requiring more stringent regulations for pipelines that pose a greater risk to public safety.
Gathering line regulations
Pipeline operators must use API RP-80 to determine the whether an onshore gas pipeline is a gathering line. API RP 80 defines gas gathering through a series of definitions, descriptions, and diagrams intended to represent the varied and complex nature of production and gathering. Once an operator identifies a pipeline as an onshore gathering line, then they must determine if the line is subject to regulation, and what regulations apply.
Class locations
All Class 1 gas gathering lines are exempt from regulations under Part 192. All Class 3 and 4 gas gathering lines are subject to regulations in Part 192. Class 2 lines may or may not be regulated, depending on additional operating conditions and additional population density analysis.
Part 192.5 defines what a location unit is and what class locations as follows:
Type A or Type B
PHMSA used a risk-based classification to establish safety standards for the higher-risk pipelines and to relax current standards on the low-risk gathering lines. The type is determined based on “feature,” which is related to how close the line will be operated to the maximum strength of the line. For metallic lines, it relates the maximum allowed operating pressure (MAOP) to the specified minimum yield strength (SMYS) of the pipeline. This calculation is sometimes referred to as hoop stress or percent SMYS.
Type A lines are metallic lines with a MAOP that produces a hoop stress greater than or equal to 20% of SMYS or non-metallic lines with a MAOP of more than 125 pounds per square inch gauge (psig). By contrast, Type B lines are those metallic lines with an MAOP that produces a hoop stress less than 20% SMYS or non-metallic lines with a MAOP is less than or equal to 125 psig.
What regulations apply?
As mentioned, the level of regulation increases with risk. Two tiers define the levels of risk and establish the safety requirements for these gathering lines. These two tiers are Type A and Type B.
Type A regulated onshore gathering lines must comply with the requirements of DOT Part 192 with the exception of the requirements in §192.150 and in Subpart O. Type A lines in Class 3 and 4 locations must also comply with Operator Qualification requirements. Type A lines in Class 2 locations may demonstrate compliance with Subpart N by describing the processes used by the operator to determine the qualification of persons performing the operations and maintenance tasks.
Type B lines must comply with only 6 requirements.
Figure 1 provides a flowchart of how each of these steps can be applied to metallic lines and Figure 2 provides a similar flowchart for non-metallic lines.
Additional methods for determining whether or not a Class 2, Type B line is subject to regulation are allowed. If the operator determines they have a Class 2, Type B line, the operator can use one of the following three methods to determine whether the line is regulated:
For Method b), if there are fewer than 10 dwellings in the designated area, then that portion of the pipeline is not regulated. Likewise for method c), if there are fewer than 5 dwellings in the designated area, then that portion of the pipeline is not regulated. Figure 3 provides a graphic example of all three methods where the line would not be regulated under method b) or c). It should be noted that the operator may choose any method on any line, and is not restricted to selecting one method for all Class 2, Type B lines.
Methods b) and c) require training of personnel to understand the new definitions. Although additional field verification and time are needed to complete the analysis, the regulated footage may be reduced if these other methods are implemented. This is the benefit to operators in applying the non-traditional approach for the Class 2 pipelines.
Compliance deadlines
The following compliance deadlines will be of interest to gas gathering pipeline operators:
Conclusion
With the passage of the new Gas Gathering Line Definition; Alternative Definition for Onshore Lines and New Safety Standards Rule, PHMSA has given operators in the gas gathering industry a better definition for gas gathering and allows them to focus resources on the pipelines most critical to ensuring continued protection of public safety. GIS tools are also being integrated with pipeline compliance activities to improve information operators can use in determining if pipelines are regulated. These GIS mapping tools allow operators to perform quick validation of field data, identify encroachment, and take other proactive measure to help protect their assets and maintain pipeline integrity.
Acknowledgment
Based on a paper presented at the GITA 16th Annual GIS for Oil & Gas Conference, September 26, 2007, in Houston, Texas.
|
Loading...
|