Ron Miller, Basic Systems, Inc., Derwent, Ohio;
and Dwayne A. Hickman, ACI Services, Inc., Cambridge, Ohio
Modern PLCs offer the computing power necessary to implement complex control strategies that can incorporate multi-unit supervisory station control, as well as individual unit control methodologies based on load and/or flow.
When controlling a reciprocating compressor, it is critical that the PLC is able to model unit loads and flows, select safe and optimum load steps, handle curve-crossings, and stay out of operating areas that can lead to serious issues, such as rod loads, pin non-reversals, low volumetric efficiencies, high discharge temperatures, and blow-through.
When properly implemented, these strategies can help maximize the desired performance criteria (flow, fuel, emissions, safety, etc.), while protecting the unit from exceeding its design limits. However, when not implemented properly, a unit under automated control can experience problems that can result in unstable control, and/or a reduction of unit availability.
The goal here is to describe methodologies for controlling reciprocating compressors using either PID-based approaches or deadband-based approaches. In this discussion, it will be useful to address issues typically experienced with controlling reciprocating compressors, and present possible solutions.
Automating reciprocating compressors Reciprocating compressors compress gas by means of simple and straightforward actions: safe and proper control of them is not so simple. This article details one method for controlling a single reciprocating compressor using the control methods of: load step control (clearance pockets and end deactivation), speed control (for engines, VFD motors, and fixed-speed motors with torque converters, and suction (inlet) gas pressure control (aka suction throttling, or pinching suction).
Unit bypass control (flowing part or all of the discharge gas, after it is cooled, back to the inlet piping) is usually used as a last resort just to keep the unit up and running (i.e. in remote areas where very cold weather can make starting a cold unit quite difficult, or in situations to handle extreme upsets such as pigs becoming stuck in the pipeline). Unit bypass control is not fully addressed here, primarily because it is not used as a load or flow control device. However, it is often used as a high discharge line pressure and/or low suction line pressure control. When used, it may lead to an increase in gas inlet temperatures.
Discharge pressure control (aka pinching discharge) is occasionally used to force certain pressure ratios for testing and tuning unit performance, and can be used to maintain a minimum unit load during normal operations. Pinching discharge pressure can also be used in low differential situations to create load on the unit while having less of an effect on flow.
Control method premises
The control methods described here are designed for compression of natural gas, from 0 to 3300 psia (0 to 227.5 bara). Due to thermodynamic properties, compression of other types of gases (e.g. process gases) can lead to issues where alternate control logic may be more appropriate. The control logic described is valid for single and multistage units; however, additional logic is often required when handling multistage units with various types of sidestreams (in or out), handling multiple services of gas compression on one compressor frame, and/or staging units together (output from one unit flows into another nearby unit). Nevertheless, the topics discussed here lay a solid foundation for alternate control philosophies.
To ensure safety, methods and procedures to prevent/remove liquid dropouts must be implemented. This document assumes that the fluids being compressed are always in their gaseous states. Manual devices, such as valve spacers, cylinder plugs, and manual variable volume pockets (VVPs) usually cannot be automated. As such, these manually operated types of load devices are not considered in the general automation methods. However, a control panel may be setup such that it has multiple control methods, each based on specific hardware arrangements (i.e. one control model for each scenario of that unit having 0, 8, or 16 valves spacers, or single-stage versus two-stage operation of a unit). Caution must be applied since the control panel does not usually have any sensor feedback to know the current physical hardware arrangement of the unit as last configured by the operators/mechanics.
Station control overview
The overall capacity control of a station with multiple units may be implemented in a number of ways. The main process variables usually being controlled are one or more of the following:
When multiple process variables are being controlled, there is a low selector employed so that the variable which results in the lowest capacity (or load) is selected for use in controlling the station.
The process controllers are usually located in a station PLC. The output of the process controllers is sent to the unit control system as a speed set point, torque set point or combination of both. Some operators use a common set point for all of the running units, while others will uniformly load all but one of the running units and send the variable capacity signal to the remaining swing unit. The unit capacity controller then makes the necessary adjustment to the unit (speed and/or load step) to meet the new set points. In some special cases, the unit controller may also have to control a suction or discharge throttle valve to meet minimum or maximum horsepower requirements of the driver or for additional capacity turndown.
The station controls can be configured with varying degrees of complexity. For instance, the controller can simply make adjustments to the capacity control. Then, when the capacity control is calling for maximum or minimum output and the station is still not making set point, it is up to an operator to start or stop a unit.
Alternatively, the station controls can be setup to automatically start or stop units based on failure to meet current set points. The success of this implementation depends on the nature of the system load swings and how these swings are incorporated into the PLC logic. One variation of this for storage facilities is to incorporate the daily nomination into the flow set point and base the flow set point on the amount of gas remaining to be pumped.
In some stations there are multiple services that must be addressed. In these instances, there are sets of process controllers for each service and then the units are assigned manually or automatically to a service before they are started.
Considerations prior to automation
With the implementation of a control strategy, the unit will be operating at the highest possible load for a given operating condition. Therefore, the unit will most likely be operating at a higher load than before the automation. It would be prudent to identify any reasons why a unit may not be able to operate at full capacity. Nothing will be gained by optimizing the loading and flow control of a unit if the unit is not mechanically sound, or ancillary systems are not adequate to run the unit at full load, or if the pipeline system will not accommodate the increased capacity.
Here are a few questions to consider:
Starting a unit
A normal unit start (safely taking the unit from the normal stop condition to the condition of being online and compressing gas) sequence is:
At the completion of the warm-up period, close the bypass valve to load the unit. Make sure that the travel time of the bypass valve is slow enough to allow the governor to maintain control of the unit speed without stalling, over-speeding or surging of the unit.
The control of the load control devices is usually incorporated into the overall unit control system. All load control devices (volume pockets, end deactivators, etc.) should be set so as to provide minimum load. In general, this means that all volume pockets are fully open and all end deactivators are engaged (i.e. gas is not compressed in those cylinder ends).
A unit can experience issues such as rod loads, pin non-reversals, and high temperatures when operating at the initial startup pressures, minimum speed, and least-load load step. Thus, it is critical to make sure that the least-load/load step is safe to use at the current speed and expected suction and discharge pressures. If it is not safe to use, then do one, the other, or both of the following:
If neither adjustment provides for a safe operating condition, then the unit should be shut down. When the bypass is fully closed, then the unit is online and subject to control by the general unit control and the active permissives being used.
After the unit is initially placed online, it may be significantly below its specified torque set point. During this time, the time to pause between hardware changes during loading is usually significantly shorter than normal loading pauses. Load step delays may be from 5 to 30 seconds during initial loading, but may be from 30 seconds to three minutes for normal loading. However, even in normal loading, if the current load is 10% to 15% below desired load, a faster loading time may be used to expedite the loading.
General unit control
With fixed-speed units, it is more common to use a set of permissives with defined deadbands. This allows the controlling method to only engage discrete steps of change when one of the permissives requires a unit adjustment. However, with variable speed units, PID (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) loops are most common. Since PID loops continually act to adjust the unit, care must be given to distinguish between discrete operating changes such as what occurs with changes in load step, and smooth changes such as what occurs with changes in speed, changes in pressure, and flow via recycle valves.
The most common control permissives used when controlling a single reciprocating unit are:
Discrete control via deadbands
If there is a call for more load (and current load step is safe), then:
If there is a call for less load (and current load step is safe), then:
If the current load step being used is determined to be unsafe, then:
Continuous control via PID loops
PID loops are closed loop feedback control systems. The acronym PID comes from the proportional, integral and derivative terms used in the controller algorithm. A PID controller works by comparing two inputs (set point and process variable). This results in an error signal. The controller changes its output (controlled variable) based on this error signal. The change in output is continuous and is proportional to the change in error (for the proportional term), based on the amount of error over time (for the integral term) and based on the rate of change of error (for the derivative term). The overall response of the controller depends on the tuning of these parameters. In many cases, the derivative term is not included and in some cases the Integral term is also not included.
For station capacity control, a PID controller or a combination of controllers monitor certain station parameters such as flow and/or pressure, and the output is then used for controlling station capacity through the unit control system. When multiple controllers are used, a comparison is made between the different controllers and the controller that results in the lowest capacity used to control the station. The remaining controllers are put in a tracking mode to eliminate reset windup. The unit control system uses the output of the station process controllers to increase/decrease unit capacity by controlling speed, unit unloading and in some cases, throttling suction valves.
Stopping a unit
This is not a safety shut down. Handle actual safety shut downs in accordance with your company’s formal specifications. Normal stopping is designed to minimize the thermal stresses on the engine. This is accomplished by reducing the load to minimum conditions and allowing the engine to cool down for a predetermined amount of time. The stop process leaves the unit ready for its next start, and depending on the site-specific procedures, may leave the unit pressurized or unpressurized. The normal stop sequence is:
Proper care must be taken during the stopping process (as is done during the startup and unit control processes) to protect the unit from possible safety issues, such as exceeding rod load limits, or failing to properly lubricate the crosshead pin. These issues can unexpectedly arise during operations at lower speeds.
Next safe load step
Often, passing through adjacent load steps always leads to more load (if moving upwards) or always leads to less load (when moving downwards). This is typically the case when only volume pockets on the first stage of compression are present and used.
However, when volume pockets on subsequent stages are used, or when end deactivation is used (on any stage), the load step curves may crossover each other. As such, the selection of the next load step to use should be based on predicted power (or flow) and load step safety, rather than just simply incrementing (or decrement) load step numbers.
Furthermore, just because there exists a small change in actual load from one load step to another, there may exist a sizable change in flow, and vice versa. As such, an ideal selection of the next load step to use should consider its effects on both load and flow.
Acknowledgment
Based on a paper presented at the Gas Machinery Conference held in Dallas, Texas, October 1-3, 2007.
|
Loading...
|